Refuting Christian Fundamentalist Presuppositional Apologetic Gaslighting

[First Draft] [Part 1 in a series] [ Link to discussion ] Re: "What I find difficult to debate against the idea that the Christian God is the necessary force behind truth and logic. In order to argue against the Christian God you would have to borrow rationality and logic from the Christian worldview. You can’t just say there is a neutral ground. You have to adopt a worldview where you have your logic justified. I don’t see any justification for truth and logic outside of the character of the Christian God." --- Saying (anyone) (who wants to refute Christian fundamentalism; since that absolutely is the flavor of Christianity presuppers are presupposing) "would have to borrow rationality and logic from the Christian worldview" ... is like saying: (anyone) who wants to refute Westboro Baptists' claim to being the most loving and peaceful religion ever to exist ... "would (first) have to borrow love and peace from the Westboro Baptist worldview". Howe...