Feminism; The Destrutive Polemic That Tries To Disguise Itself As Enlightened Egalitarianism.
Speaking from a polemic perspective, one Feminist shared this image:
Under that image, she wrote:
Imagine thinking this was ever fucking real 
Men literally have no idea that this type of “housewife” was itself, propaganda.
That companies MADE men believe this type of woman, this type of housewife, really enjoyed being this.
That she wasn’t drugged up with amphetamines to lose weight and do it all, barbiturates to stay sane and using an entire drawer of makeup to hide the bruises from her husband.
Imagine the level of delusion to not know that this was some of marketing’s finest work - convincing men that this was what women wanted. That this was what made women happy. That this was real.
My own thoughts about this are as follows: Notice how she just says, "Men literally have no idea". Not "such men" or "some men". All men. Notice, also, how her narrative keeps all women safely away from all scrutiny and responsibility.
Women are not *naturally* unreasonable or unaccountable. Instead, our systems instill those dysfunctions.
Our systems also foster such in some men, but differently
Men, in general, are still held to a higher degree of responsibility. In some situations, men are rightly called out for their bullshit. In some situations, men are held accountable. In some situations, men are unwisely protected from accountability. In some situations, men are demonized merely for being innocently shortsighted and manipulated. This can happen when men have been manipulated by societal systems, or when those men have been manipulated by women. All the while, most women remain less accountable 1v1. As for men in political power, they are not "all men". Nor are women in political power "all women". Those special cases highlight how positions of power are most often sought by the worst of all humans, who should not be allowed anywhere near positions of power. This is directly related to how authoritarian religions weaponize both men's and women's minds against themselves and against each other. Such religions create dangerous minds. And then unleash those minds upon an unsuspecting world. Now that so many women are outgrowing and escaping those religions, they recognize their societal culture's collective dysfunction. But under the influence of "Feminism", those women are not seeing the bigger picture. They inaccurately identify "all men" and "the nature of men" as the evil that enslaved them. So then they wage social and ideological war against "men". This only worsens the divide and thus prevents the better world they seek. Here is a recent example from a YouTube channel I have since stopped following:
She didn't want to speak responsibly. In fact, it wasn't an accident. She meant to incriminate all men. So when a fan/follower/supporter/ally (a man) posted a simple and important observation in her comments section, ... She did not WANT to ignore it. She did not want to accept it as good constructive insight either.
It's funny how these are the same people who want to see more people using gender-neutral pronouns. But whenever the topic is ABUSE, it's MEN-turtles, all the way down.
Meanwhile, one of my favorite Bible scholars is caught up in the same dysfunction.
Her unhealed trauma, caused by specific yet unnamed men, fuels her scholarship.
In this way, she turns something deeply negative into something positive.
However, it also weaponizes her against men in general.
She may experience some systemic prejudices against women in academia.
I do not doubt this.
But at the same time, her mind sometimes sees this happening where it isn't. I know this for a fact.
I've seen her triggered by this (at some other guy I barely know). And when that happens, she becomes very unkind.
She is cute, smart, and has good social skills.
But until she heals past the wounds that bind her to cultural Feminism, ...
It would be ... unhealthy for any man to be part of her most personal paradigm.
And yet, she's unlikely to experience that growth, because capital-F Feminism keeps reassuring her that men are always the problem.
My ex, Mindy, was the same way.
Any man she ever is "with" will find himself paying on other men's personal debts. And those payments will only ever count towards the interest; never on the principal.
He won't be accruing any "equity" in that investment.
He'll only keep taking a loss until he either runs dry or simply tires of thanking her for the privilege.
Feminism is exactly that, but for an entire maladaptive subculture.
There, we see the dog-trained "good boys" of Liberal culture who feel like they need to virtue-signal agreement about how awful men are.
I see the same thing happening with white men who carry "white guilt" for shit they never did and never even tolerated.
I'd never kinkshame for any adult consensual kinks.
I don't care how many atheists lick lady heels.
-Just as I don't care when Christians and Muslims lick God-boots.
But once you make that non-consenting people's problem, it becomes everyone's business.
I, too, hold patriarchal systems in contempt.
Let's take a closer and more honest look at the trad-family paradigm.
On paper, it was a fair deal. But in reality, it was not.
It's very unfair to women. But it isn't a good arrangement for men either.
Work, for most men, was brutal.
When the man got home from work, BOTH parents needed hours of rest and recreation. However, this would be impossible without a third adult to take over.
Some parents tried to cheat the system by forcing their kids to become part of "Team Parents"; -with an equal share of parental responsibilities, but none of the perks. "Go team!".
-
That "plan" robs children of their childhood.
It also robs children of the psychosocial maturation they should have been gleaning from socializing (in healthy ways) with peers.
Granted, most kids also attended "school".
But those institutions are designed to perpetuate social division.
This is the real reason public schools in the USA go out of their way to "not notice" bullying, but then come down hard on kids who fight back.
To ensure maximum control, "We, The People" must be kept warring against each other.
And the most effective way to ensure that outcome is to manufacture unaccountable predators and helpless prey.
THAT is the true primary function of our public AND private pediatric education systems.
These are systems built by predators who seek to ensure neither themselves nor their children will ever have to "settle" for something as scary and humbling as equality.
They reason this way:
It's delusional and destructive.
But it's not new.
It is, evidently, how most pastors and politicians feel.
And that feeling shapes their story.
It creates a sense of "cosmic order" which they "humbly" accept as a necessary evil.
From there, they reason that all the lavish benefits they syphon from those below are "blessings"; rewards for ensuring that social order.
This is how power corrupts.
Other consequences to children included:
*Church-based socialization. This is unnatural and assists the process of hijacking those children's respective identities. It is also a primary driving force of social division, authoritarianism, and master-slave mentality.
* Forcing those children into forms of legal slavery they never signed up for.
* Diverting precious time, energy, and focus away from those children's education (K-12, and beyond).
* Indoctrinating those children into the very same social-rolls systems that rob them (each next generation) of their potential to do something more (and healthier) with their lives.
*Trapping those children into generational cycles as miserably unhappy and unhealthy, consumerist breeders, who keep mistakenly thinking that being parents will make them happy.
"Marriage" is a failed socioeconomic experiment, at best.
A few people are happily married after 10 years together.
But those people would have been happily together ... even without ceremony or papers.
It takes a special set of circumstances to make that possible.
But our society is collectively clueless about what that takes.
Our young people get together with (usually) good intentions.
But they do not realize how unfair the situation is ... that they are creating ... together.
Generation after generation, those mistakes are made.
If the man in those situations had made the sacrifices needed for the woman's life-circumstances to be not-horrible, he would have been driving himself into even deeper despair;
and an even earlier grave.
Traditionally, men have given themselves permission to be selfish after work and on weekends.
That is unfair.
But I call this "The Lifeguard Paradox".
I first encountered this wisdom while watching the original Baywatch TV series.
I wasn't able to find a video clip of this. However, I think it's one of the most important commentaries from that (or any) series.
The gist of it is this:
If you are a lifeguard, it means you are responsible for other people's lives.
If you are in the process of doing your job, and a giant wave is about to throw you and the person you are rescuing against a peer, your instincts might be to PROTECT that vulnerable person by absorbing the brunt of the impending impact.
However, that's the wrong thing to do.
The lifeguard, in such a situation, should protect themselves from that trauma by allowing the more vulnerable person to take the brunt of the force.
Why?
Because if the lifeguard takes that damage, BOTH people will probably drown.
Similarly, fathers had to be selfish in how they managed their good health and function.
Otherwise, the entire family would eventually drown in greater shared consequence.
This is why monogamy doesn't work for raising children, unless the parents are wealthy enough to hire professional surrogate parents.
These are among the many reasons why most people should not have kids.
If you're going to be raising kids in the midst of economic struggle, you'll need (yes, I said "need") either:
a.) a village society (the sort we still see in remote parts of Africa and Australia)
or
b.) carefully structured polyamory;
in my [fuck "humble"] opinion.
#ittakesavilliage
Radical departure from "Conservative Values" is a functional imperative.
Capital-F Feminism realizes this intuitively. However, they still need help gaining greater clarity.
Sex-warfare mentality is impeding their vision.
In most cases, the "husband" didn't deceptively and selfishly maneuver a woman into those circumstances.
They are BOTH deceived into impossible situations by SYSTEMS; systems that have always intended to lock each next generation into being exploitable assets.
HUMANS are manipulated and trapped into decades of self-sacrifice.
Most of their sacrifices are funneled into the power and wealth of the men who sat atop economic, political, and religious systems.
Some of those resources go into the essential needs of children, but usually *just enough* to keep those children alive ... while indoctrinating them into the systems which perpetuate enslavement, suffering, and dysfunction.
Governments, Corporations, Churches, and Families.
Today, we see increasingly more women ascending into positions of power and influence. This is where we also discover that most women in power are equally willing to help "game" those systems to their own selfish advantage, without concern for those who suffer under those systems.
The innately superior nobility of womendom is a lie.
Women, by nature, are not more compassionate.
Nor are they less violent.
A matriarchal system would be equally unjust.
Human systems are social machines.
Machines that divide people into groups of competing identities ... propagate dysfunction.
Patriarchal systems are guilty of this.
Capital-F "Feminism" is not any better.
It wages a war of propaganda against all men, while falsely pretending to be all about equitable respect and healing.
This is the primary reason that "The Left eats itself; in a way that The Right doesn't.".
Humans should not be competing to have their needs met.
Humans should not be demonizing each other as a means to that end.
Better-built systems generate better people.
However, the only path to building better systems is to alleviate widespread suffering and (relevant) points of ignorance.
The ONLY way to do that is to redirect any society's massive pool of economic resources into making every health-essential resource free. -Charging only for excesses and luxuries.
There should be ample support in place for people with disabilities, so they, too, can uphold their responsibilities.
Every time someone in a position of social or economic power tries to prevent needed changes, they should be promptly and completely removed from positions where they could further sabotage society. -By whatever means are necessary.
Such persons should be rehabilitated, if possible. Or otherwise studied for science, and kept somewhere out of the way.
They should be removed as an obstacle in humanity's path forward.
Or, if people prefer, we can just keep things how they are. Because that's working out great.
School shootings, fascism, domestic abuse, fatal diseases, and most people are quietly weighing either mass homicide or suicide as an option.
This is, of course, what we'll do; until there is no longer anyone around to argue about it.
"Sweet Dreams Are Made Of This".
Who am I to disagree?
But any alternative form of violently destructive hivemind ... is not a trek forward.
Work, for most men, was brutal.
When the man got home from work, BOTH parents needed hours of rest and recreation. However, this would be impossible without a third adult to take over.
Some parents tried to cheat the system by forcing their kids to become part of "Team Parents"; -with an equal share of parental responsibilities, but none of the perks. "Go team!".
-
That "plan" robs children of their childhood.
It also robs children of the psychosocial maturation they should have been gleaning from socializing (in healthy ways) with peers.
Granted, most kids also attended "school".
But those institutions are designed to perpetuate social division.
This is the real reason public schools in the USA go out of their way to "not notice" bullying, but then come down hard on kids who fight back.
To ensure maximum control, "We, The People" must be kept warring against each other.
And the most effective way to ensure that outcome is to manufacture unaccountable predators and helpless prey.
THAT is the true primary function of our public AND private pediatric education systems.
These are systems built by predators who seek to ensure neither themselves nor their children will ever have to "settle" for something as scary and humbling as equality.
They reason this way:
It's delusional and destructive.
But it's not new.
It is, evidently, how most pastors and politicians feel.
And that feeling shapes their story.
It creates a sense of "cosmic order" which they "humbly" accept as a necessary evil.
From there, they reason that all the lavish benefits they syphon from those below are "blessings"; rewards for ensuring that social order.
This is how power corrupts.
Other consequences to children included:
*Church-based socialization. This is unnatural and assists the process of hijacking those children's respective identities. It is also a primary driving force of social division, authoritarianism, and master-slave mentality.
* Forcing those children into forms of legal slavery they never signed up for.
* Diverting precious time, energy, and focus away from those children's education (K-12, and beyond).
* Indoctrinating those children into the very same social-rolls systems that rob them (each next generation) of their potential to do something more (and healthier) with their lives.
*Trapping those children into generational cycles as miserably unhappy and unhealthy, consumerist breeders, who keep mistakenly thinking that being parents will make them happy.
"Marriage" is a failed socioeconomic experiment, at best.
A few people are happily married after 10 years together.
But those people would have been happily together ... even without ceremony or papers.
It takes a special set of circumstances to make that possible.
But our society is collectively clueless about what that takes.
Our young people get together with (usually) good intentions.
But they do not realize how unfair the situation is ... that they are creating ... together.
Generation after generation, those mistakes are made.
If the man in those situations had made the sacrifices needed for the woman's life-circumstances to be not-horrible, he would have been driving himself into even deeper despair;
and an even earlier grave.
Traditionally, men have given themselves permission to be selfish after work and on weekends.
That is unfair.
But I call this "The Lifeguard Paradox".
I first encountered this wisdom while watching the original Baywatch TV series.
I wasn't able to find a video clip of this. However, I think it's one of the most important commentaries from that (or any) series.
The gist of it is this:
If you are a lifeguard, it means you are responsible for other people's lives.
If you are in the process of doing your job, and a giant wave is about to throw you and the person you are rescuing against a peer, your instincts might be to PROTECT that vulnerable person by absorbing the brunt of the impending impact.
However, that's the wrong thing to do.
The lifeguard, in such a situation, should protect themselves from that trauma by allowing the more vulnerable person to take the brunt of the force.
Why?
Because if the lifeguard takes that damage, BOTH people will probably drown.
Similarly, fathers had to be selfish in how they managed their good health and function.
Otherwise, the entire family would eventually drown in greater shared consequence.
This is why monogamy doesn't work for raising children, unless the parents are wealthy enough to hire professional surrogate parents.
These are among the many reasons why most people should not have kids.
If you're going to be raising kids in the midst of economic struggle, you'll need (yes, I said "need") either:
a.) a village society (the sort we still see in remote parts of Africa and Australia)
or
b.) carefully structured polyamory;
in my [fuck "humble"] opinion.
#ittakesavilliage
Radical departure from "Conservative Values" is a functional imperative.
Capital-F Feminism realizes this intuitively. However, they still need help gaining greater clarity.
Sex-warfare mentality is impeding their vision.
In most cases, the "husband" didn't deceptively and selfishly maneuver a woman into those circumstances.
They are BOTH deceived into impossible situations by SYSTEMS; systems that have always intended to lock each next generation into being exploitable assets.
HUMANS are manipulated and trapped into decades of self-sacrifice.
Most of their sacrifices are funneled into the power and wealth of the men who sat atop economic, political, and religious systems.
Some of those resources go into the essential needs of children, but usually *just enough* to keep those children alive ... while indoctrinating them into the systems which perpetuate enslavement, suffering, and dysfunction.
Governments, Corporations, Churches, and Families.
Today, we see increasingly more women ascending into positions of power and influence. This is where we also discover that most women in power are equally willing to help "game" those systems to their own selfish advantage, without concern for those who suffer under those systems.
The innately superior nobility of womendom is a lie.
Women, by nature, are not more compassionate.
Nor are they less violent.
A matriarchal system would be equally unjust.
Human systems are social machines.
Machines that divide people into groups of competing identities ... propagate dysfunction.
Patriarchal systems are guilty of this.
Capital-F "Feminism" is not any better.
It wages a war of propaganda against all men, while falsely pretending to be all about equitable respect and healing.
This is the primary reason that "The Left eats itself; in a way that The Right doesn't.".
Humans should not be competing to have their needs met.
Humans should not be demonizing each other as a means to that end.
Better-built systems generate better people.
However, the only path to building better systems is to alleviate widespread suffering and (relevant) points of ignorance.
The ONLY way to do that is to redirect any society's massive pool of economic resources into making every health-essential resource free. -Charging only for excesses and luxuries.
There should be ample support in place for people with disabilities, so they, too, can uphold their responsibilities.
Every time someone in a position of social or economic power tries to prevent needed changes, they should be promptly and completely removed from positions where they could further sabotage society. -By whatever means are necessary.
Such persons should be rehabilitated, if possible. Or otherwise studied for science, and kept somewhere out of the way.
They should be removed as an obstacle in humanity's path forward.
Or, if people prefer, we can just keep things how they are. Because that's working out great.
School shootings, fascism, domestic abuse, fatal diseases, and most people are quietly weighing either mass homicide or suicide as an option.
This is, of course, what we'll do; until there is no longer anyone around to argue about it.
"Sweet Dreams Are Made Of This".
Who am I to disagree?
'%3E%3Cpath%20d='M15.9963%208c0%204.4179-3.5811%207.9993-7.9986%207.9993-4.4176%200-7.9987-3.5814-7.9987-7.9992%200-4.4179%203.5811-7.9992%207.9987-7.9992%204.4175%200%207.9986%203.5813%207.9986%207.9992Z'%20fill='url(%23paint0_linear_15251_63610)'/%3E%3Cpath%20d='M15.9973%207.9992c0%204.4178-3.5811%207.9992-7.9987%207.9992C3.5811%2015.9984%200%2012.417%200%207.9992S3.5811%200%207.9986%200c4.4176%200%207.9987%203.5814%207.9987%207.9992Z'%20fill='url(%23paint1_radial_15251_63610)'/%3E%3Cpath%20d='M7.9996%205.9081c-.3528-.8845-1.1936-1.507-2.1748-1.507-1.4323%200-2.4254%201.328-2.4254%202.6797%200%202.2718%202.3938%204.0094%204.0816%205.1589.3168.2157.7205.2157%201.0373%200%201.6878-1.1495%204.0815-2.8871%204.0815-5.159%200-1.3517-.993-2.6796-2.4254-2.6796-.9811%200-1.822.6225-2.1748%201.507Z'%20fill='%23fff'/%3E%3C/g%3E%3Cdefs%3E%3CradialGradient%20id='paint1_radial_15251_63610'%20cx='0'%20cy='0'%20r='1'%20gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse'%20gradientTransform='matrix(0%207.9992%20-7.99863%200%207.9986%207.9992)'%3E%3Cstop%20offset='.5637'%20stop-color='%23E11731'%20stop-opacity='0'/%3E%3Cstop%20offset='1'%20stop-color='%23E11731'%20stop-opacity='.1'/%3E%3C/radialGradient%3E%3ClinearGradient%20id='paint0_linear_15251_63610'%20x1='2.3986'%20y1='2.4007'%20x2='13.5975'%20y2='13.5993'%20gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse'%3E%3Cstop%20stop-color='%23FF74AE'/%3E%3Cstop%20offset='.5001'%20stop-color='%23FA2E3E'/%3E%3Cstop%20offset='1'%20stop-color='%23FF5758'/%3E%3C/linearGradient%3E%3CclipPath%20id='clip0_15251_63610'%3E%3Cpath%20fill='%23fff'%20d='M-.001.0009h15.9992v15.9984H-.001z'/%3E%3C/clipPath%3E%3C/defs%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Comments
Post a Comment