Posts

Showing posts from February, 2025

Lumping and Bashing Jesus's Favorite Cookianity?

Image
  Link to Facebook video about the parallels between Christianity and Narcissism. That content creator also has a YouTube channel [ link ]   In reply to her Facebook video,  Logan Clark  wrote:  Which Christians g? You be literally over generalizing It's the same thing as me saying "all women" or "all men" also you probably have a shit experience with zealot Christians smfh Some of them are good people 18h Like Reply Ruth Chalk Logan Clark  ugh omg this. Like we can say it's all men we can say it's all Christians but what if we said it's women or black people or it's the lgbtq.....I love this double standard society has. If youre not bashing men and Christians then you're a  bigot and a hater..... it's so wild to me... I can't understand it. I hate new world feminism and what it's done to people. First, a note to Logan Clark: In that video, she specified which "Christianity" she was talking about. She specified the ...

Responding to Jimmy "Tux TV" About Randal Rauser Hiding Our Comments @ RR's Channel

Image
  re "either YT or RR has hidden our comments FYI" -  @JimmyTuxTv  --- RR (Randal Rauser) does hide at least most of what I say there. I realized that months ago. That's why I only post rarely to his channel; to test and see if he's allowing them through. Although to be honest, I'd likely forget about his channel if the algorithm didn't keep reminding me that he's still around and talking about issues I'm interested in. But you can see my comments (there) under a recent video. So maybe he stopped hiding them? In any case, I think he is very sensitive to criticism. But I can sympathize with how frustrating it must be when the least educated and least ethical apologists get the most respect, largest followings, and most support from other Christians. And yet, that's really to be expected. The whole reason Christianity (as a religious theme or domain) spread and survived is that it appeals to the WORST aspects of human psycholog...

Who sets the laws of the secular world and why is wrong to break those laws?

Image
  Responding to: "Who sets the laws of the secular world and why is wrong to break those laws?" -  @jdaze1  ---- That question was posed in the comments section of this video: . My thoughts about it: Every rule and law ever codified and enforced by humans ... has been written by humans. Even if there are any Super-Powered Super-People living in some phantom realm, ... We humans are still functioning on our own. Mind you, strictly speaking, I'm not an "atheist". I think spirituality can be a fully legitimate domain of exploration, discovery, and growth. I think some personal experiences are real. I think some miraculous events do happen. I just refuse to assume The Source is a literal person with a name, political ambitions, or who issues dogmas, threats, and bribes. It's probably something more like Taoistic Pansychism. But I just call it "The Source", "The River", and "The Mystery"; because I don't really kn...