Why God Sticks Peters In Your Face

 

Introducing ...

Dave Peters; an Ambassador for the Creator Of The MotherFucking Universe. Just like "the Church", Dave is bold enough

to function as
The Creator's own voice and hands on Earth.

Dave Peters knows.
When we hear an "authorized agent" speak for "God", 
we are hearing from God himself. 

 Dave Peters also knows that Heaven is a finite space.

Nobody likes a crowded kingdom. 
 
Nor does the Christian "God" value human life, nor health, nor dignity.  


Thus, stumbling people AWAY from "God" 
and into "Hell" is part of "God's Grand Plan".

God,
according to his fanatics, 
has always intended for them to be a problem 
for everyone else. 

Thus,
"God" pushes many Peters
into our collective faces; 
to ensure as many souls as possible 
go to "The Bad Place". 

This is also PART of the reason why God sends his own people to DEFY HIMSELF.

According to his minions,
"God" sends his minions
to push for anti-abortion legislation in the kingdoms of MAN, to PREVENT Free Will.

GOD can't do that himself, because the entire POINT of this world's suffering is (according to those very same minions) to show how much God values and prioritizes the necessity of Free Will. 

So then "God" sends agents
to DEFY his own moral-stand about Free Will.

That way, God's hands don't get dirty by DOING a thing that contradicts his own moral precepts.  

Those who NOTICE that contradiction
will be stumbled away from "God";
 and thus into a "Hell".

Those who ALSO notice when they are being very aggressively disrespected 
will then ALSO be stumbled;
-along with countless silent observers who watch those scenes unfold;
on social media, on mass media, and in the political arena.  

This, too,
according to the CHOICES made by his minions ("in His name") must also be part of that great plan. 

Here, we see that plan in action. 

Thus, Dave Peters says to me ... 
"I see you failed biology. I know it's upsetting when someone with no formal education make points that you can't refute. I'll try to make it easier for you to understand. A cancer cell is part of that humans body. A fertilized egg is not. If it was then you would still be part of your mothers, and for that matter, your fathers body instead of being your own entity. Your insults would be hurtful if they actually meant something other than your grasping at straws trying to win a debate where even science shows you that your wrong. Keep searching. you may eventually find your mistake. Peace be with you."

My reply:

I understand how personal you are making this for countless
real people
in our real world
that just simply don't register (for you) as persons. 
 
They/we aren't persons, to you.

And why not?

Because your religion teaches that everyone is living TRASH and due to be burned forever;
except for the lucky few who prove sufficiently USEFUL as a utility for his ego (which is really just your ego). 

Thus, you see all of this as "not personal". 

--
As for your arguments, ...

What you are proposing is that: living cells are either
a.) independent living cells
or otherwise
b.) just part of a woman's own body ...
based on whether or not they are attached to a woman's body.

From there, you argue that fertilized cells are not attached; and therefor: those cells are their own separate 'something'.

From there, you just swap out that 'something' ...
for the concept of 'someone', 
without any rational, ethical, or scientific justification for declaring that it's a "someone". 
 
You can say that "science says so".
But you're just making that up. 

However, if I humor that way of reasoning,
then: your reasoning defeats itself. Your entire premise crumbles ... just as soon as that egg attaches to the woman.

Soon after that, even the crumbled ruins of your argument turn to dust and float away
...
once that multiplying collection of cells establishes a dependent and connected flow of blood, oxygen, and nutrients, as a contiguous extension of that female person's own body.
That, by the way, happens before those cells have yet had time to develop a brain;
and, therefor, before there's any available logical premise for calling it a person.

Even after that development, 
 the umbilical cord persists to ensure the fetus is a contiguous extension of the female in which it grows. 

I'm a little surprised you never learned how that works. 

Although,
I suppose we can blame "religious education" for that. 

If something ain't in a Bible, us worldly people should never assume you've heard about it. 
---
However,
I have literally zero care/concern
for how you think about it.

Religiously fundamentalist minds
are free to strongly feel and half-way-think
as they do.
It makes no difference to me.

The only thing which I (along with the vast majority of humans in developed nations who agree with me) care about, in the context of these controversies, is this:

Your religious beliefs (found exactly nowhere in Hebrew religious history, nor in 1st Century Christianity, nor in science)
are being desperately and badly reasoned
as a justification
for weaponizing our government against its own citizens, in the name of protecting "babies" that only exist in your imagination.

Even more ironically,
you're "stumbling" countless many people (more and more, every day) away from your beliefs,
and into the "Hell" your barbaric religion(s) claim to believe in.

You're also DEFYING the "God" you fundies claim to believe in, because you're taking a stand AGAINST "God" by deciding that He's WRONG to allow free will for acts he wishes people didn't do.

You're letting "Him" know that: what he SHOULD be doing is NOT allowing Free Will for "wrong actions".

You're deciding that YOU know better than your own "God";

taking matters into your own hands, to weaponize entire governments against the "wicked worldly people",
...
so that whenever they sufficiently offend your views about moral issues,
there will be * POLICE who show up * point GUNS at people, * shoot them if they resist, and * lock survivors into little cages, * while the govt decides on which offenders to give a lethal injection to ... vs which to just strip of human rights and leave rotting in a manufactured hell-on-earth * as a lesson to ALL who would oppose YOUR moral authority.

Meanwhile,
to humor your ridiculous religion even a little further, ...

you'd be CONDEMNING new-people to life on our prison-planet,
by DENYING them a FREE PASS to "Heaven".

You'd be ensuring BAD ODDS of avoiding "Hell" at the end of their lives,
while denying them 100% guarantee of eternal Heaven IF ONLY they had been LIBERATED from their carnal-shells before they even had a brain to suffer and sin with.

It just amazes me to see how much you lemming-zealots
like to play God
and hate babies.
 

At both the beginning and end of every day,
we aren't the monsters.

You are.