How Every "Messenger" Disproves Their Own "God"
Found here:
Link
Video is called "Christians: “Sherri, stop blaming god!”
- by Sherri Bothwell
In reply, on her Facebook page,
someone named "Mow Hawk" left this ridiculous WALLOFTEXT:
Mow Hawk (wrote)
I am by no means stretch of the imagination that I am better than ya all. But blaming God for things for many years, is not the answer. The answer is in the living tests of your heart. What slings an arrows flies at you, that triggers your heart consciousness emotions and mind is a test. Battle through it. It is a blessing to figure out what's triggering you. It is the mirror image of karma returning to you to overcome your obstacles. It's a blessing to receive it with love. Honour it and forgive it's existence. Just flow through it with grace, love and compassion and send it on it's way. If it comes to you, recognise it and then shift consciousness and move on. It's what I'm learning now. It will always be this no matter how high or low up the Jacob's ladder you go. Then pray to God/Jesus for understanding, strengths, knowledge and the spiritual gifts will either be added, removed or taken away from you. Sure stop sometimes and smell the roses but get back up on your feet soldier and keep soldiering on. People's consciousness around you begin to change and it will lighten their moods, so will yours of you release the fears that was in your hearts. If you fail, so what, just get up and keep trying again to recorrect your errs.
----
In reply, I offer this:
Mow Hawk
re "I am by no means stretch of the imagination that I am better than ya all. "
--
If you are a Christian,
then you DO,
in fact,
think you are better than non-Christians.
I understand why you're required to gaslight/lie with fake humility; by claiming to NOT think you're better than non-Christians.
However, ...
We can see right through it.
In fact, I've explained HOW we know this,
in prior blogs.
The VALUE
that any evaluator appraises you for
is most accurately gauged
by what they:
* want,
* plan,
* did,
or
* will do
to you.
This is when a clever apologist will say "No. The best way to tell how much value he sees in all of us ... is the value he's willing to PAY for us.
And he payed the ultimate price, to prove it."
However, that's just more layers of gaslighting.
Because:
1. According to those very same Christians,
he owns
and
has always owned
all of us;
by virtue of the alleged-fact that he owns the universe and everything in it ... because he made it, and because he says so, and because he has enough POWER to insist
and
2. If you think Jesus is GOD, then since GOD cannot DIE, nobody "died for us".
Now, you can say he fake-died for us.
But what's the point of it?
Meanwhile,
if my left hand pays my right hand,
no actual payment has transpired.
Plus, if I write a check to buy some slaves,
but then I CANCEL that check and get a full refund, then:
no price has been paid.
Getting his life back ... is like getting your money back.
Likewise,
if you think Jesus was not-God (such as what Jehovah's Witnesses believe), then someone ELSE paid for us; while GOD just sat back in his throne and watched.
But even then, how much did Jesus pay, to transfer people FROM GOD as their owner
TO GOD as ...
still their owner?
If Jesus KNEW he'd bounce right back with ultimate-and-eternal power and luxury, then:
Jesus only "sacrificed" a weekend.
-a weekend he won't even miss.
It's not as-if that weekend was going to be his only-chance-ever of going to Disney Land.
Christians don't see anyone's true value.
The can't even see their own.
Instead, the indulge self-loathing
and then compensate by still being better TRASH than everyone else.
They only see outsiders' POTENTIAL-FUTURE VALUE;
a VALUE that outsiders can only mature INTO
...
by embracing Christianity.
The Christian GOD plans to throw all the non-saved away like trash forever (or worse).
And you can't honestly deny that, because that's what "salvation" means.
It means being "saved" aka "spared";
from something that your God otherwise WILL DO to everyone deemed unworthy to spare.
And what is that dividing line based on?
Who are the "goats" vs "the sheep"?
Who are the "chaff" vs "the wheat"?
It's a "separating" of people deemed worthy to EXIST,
from people who are deemed unworthy to exist.
Based on what?
Moral character.
And it HAS TO BE THAT,
in the context of a Christian's theological-theory,
because:
If it is NOT "THAT",
then:
Their "God" would be "judging people" on a "judgement day" ... based on things that are NOT a matter of moral character.
What else is there?
Shoe size?
Hair styles?
Preferred beverages?
So let's not play stupid games about this.
You DO think you are more worthy to EXIST than anyone who is "unsaved".
And you DO think it's because you have superior moral character.
-not "perfect" moral character;
merely adequate moral character.
-adequate-enough ... that (according to your religion) you used your "free will" to "choose to be" someone good-ENOUGH that you could hear your "GOD" calling, and then good-enough that you "answered that call".
Meanwhile, when you call upon people to "Trust "God",
that "God" is YOU.
[link]
So you can take all that fake-humility and shove it up your morally superior, fake-humble, ass.
Next,
Mr. Mow Hawk,
regarding your claim that "blaming God for things for many years, is not the answer. "
---
In the short video
above
to-which you are replying, ...
she does
in fact
clarify that:
neither she
nor any atheists
ever blame (a) "God"
for anything.
They literally can't blame a literal entity for anything
if they don't believe that (whichever) literal entity
exists.
Meanwhile,
bibles are FULL of believers
blaming their "God" for almost-everything that happens to them.
And NOT ONCE does their "God" show up to say "hey, that wasn't me. I didn't do that".
Instead,
Bible writers
and Christians
say their "God" is in control over everything,
set all of this world's events into motion,
and this is all going according to his "plan".
Now, as for you saying "Then pray to God/Jesus for ", ...
The correct way to finish that sentence is:
"...for nothing.".
For absolutely nothing.
Because:
1. They aren't literally real entities.
2. Prayer is a form of psychic-begging.
Begging a fictional entity is silly.
Whereas, begging a real entity would be insulting ... to any entity who is worthy of respect.
A morally mature and healthy person (self-aware, sentient being) ... would not want anyone groveling at their feet for 'scraps of love' or help with anything at all.
Thus, to BEG such a being ... is to ACCUSE them (automatically) of being a morally immature/unhealthy person.
Likewise,
to be a messenger for a "God"
is AUTOMATICALLY
to accuse that "God"
of being not-a-God.
How so?
Because any BEING whom is infinitely more capable than YOU ...
doesn't need your help getting a message out to anyone.
To rush out into the world to "Help" a "God" ...
is even more of an insult ABOUT that "God" ...
than rushing to help a fully able-bodied young man cross a busy street.
It makes sense to offer to help a frail old person,
if they seem to be struggling.
Why?
Because trying to HELP someone ...
means you doubt their ability,
feel bad for them,
and thus want to help them.
Meanwhile,
I'm still way ahead of you.
I already know what you plan to say,
to weasel out of this.
So let's 'nip that in bud' right here and now.
Saying "I'm not trying to help GOD, I'm trying to help people; people who are struggling and DO need help crossing the moral-street to reach GOD", ...
is a distraction technique.
It's also gaslighting.
Because you're not bringing the people TO a message.
You're bringing a message TO the people; FROM an alleged "God".
-a "God" who (according to your religion)
asked you to do this FOR HIM.
Per your religion,
"He" wants people to look for him, find him, and have a relationship with him.
And that includes people who are NOT looking for any such "God".
The theory that those people "stand to benefit" from the arrangement ... is not relevant to the point I'm making.
You are helping your frightened chicken of a "God" send a message across the road;
to reach us.
You are pimping yourself out as "His" vessel;
his "chariot".
- To bring his wisdom and "presence" to all humans;
people who would otherwise not ever hear a word about it.
But ONLY the message;
corrupted so badly that even his "biggest fans" can't agree on what it used to say;
-except for a few bits about "please love me" and something mumbled about "or else I might have to hurt you".
Not the actual chicken-God.
Because he's cowering behind bushes, and peering through clouds from high places ...
waiting and worrying about how we'll reply.
Passing notes forward;
like the painfully shy boy who sits in the back of the class.
[Back of the note reads:
"You know we should be together.
Don't make me have to hurt you."]
Except,
when people look back to see who the note is from,
he's not even there.
It was evidently (according to MOUNTAINS of evidence) written by someone else;
someone who is NOT shy ... but wants to collect money (and power, and flattery) on behalf of a sickly-chicken-boy-God who they invented.
Likewise,
if a Super-Being were to ACCEPT your help ...
that would automatically validate the accusation.
Which accusation?
The one you are making against him.
The accusation
that HE needs your help.
That would be the opposite of a good "Public Relations" campaign.
Because it means you are projecting WEAKNESS and reckless irresponsibility as attributes of your "God".
Lastly, I appreciate the intent of spreading STOIC ideals.
But I can't get behind the gambit of trying to pass Christianity off as being compatible with those ideals.
It's not.
Besides entirely relying upon maneuvering people into displacing (externalizing) the locus of their identity (which is the true root of clinical narcissism), ...
Christianity is BUILT upon the Genesis-Ideal.
Those fables,
were written by abusive men.
They sought to legitimize their sickness by projecting their Major Personality Disorders
onto a "God".
-So that it would be "wrong" for anyone to question their way of 'being' in the world.
In those stories,
a Super-Father sabotaged his children's psychological capacity;
even before he made them.
He,
with the help of his people
[his flying monkeys and triangulators]
then continued to do-so ever after;
hoping to assure they could never fully reach the autonomous capacity of adulthood.
And why?
So that he will always have someone who would say "He can do no wrong"
and would be lost without him.
____
To all of that, I say:
And you can't honestly deny that, because that's what "salvation" means.
It means being "saved" aka "spared";
from something that your God otherwise WILL DO to everyone deemed unworthy to spare.
And what is that dividing line based on?
Who are the "goats" vs "the sheep"?
Who are the "chaff" vs "the wheat"?
It's a "separating" of people deemed worthy to EXIST,
from people who are deemed unworthy to exist.
Based on what?
Moral character.
And it HAS TO BE THAT,
in the context of a Christian's theological-theory,
because:
If it is NOT "THAT",
then:
Their "God" would be "judging people" on a "judgement day" ... based on things that are NOT a matter of moral character.
What else is there?
Shoe size?
Hair styles?
Preferred beverages?
So let's not play stupid games about this.
You DO think you are more worthy to EXIST than anyone who is "unsaved".
And you DO think it's because you have superior moral character.
-not "perfect" moral character;
merely adequate moral character.
-adequate-enough ... that (according to your religion) you used your "free will" to "choose to be" someone good-ENOUGH that you could hear your "GOD" calling, and then good-enough that you "answered that call".
Meanwhile, when you call upon people to "Trust "God",
that "God" is YOU.
[link]
So you can take all that fake-humility and shove it up your morally superior, fake-humble, ass.
Next,
Mr. Mow Hawk,
regarding your claim that "blaming God for things for many years, is not the answer. "
---
In the short video
above
to-which you are replying, ...
she does
in fact
clarify that:
neither she
nor any atheists
ever blame (a) "God"
for anything.
They literally can't blame a literal entity for anything
if they don't believe that (whichever) literal entity
exists.
Meanwhile,
bibles are FULL of believers
blaming their "God" for almost-everything that happens to them.
And NOT ONCE does their "God" show up to say "hey, that wasn't me. I didn't do that".
Instead,
Bible writers
and Christians
say their "God" is in control over everything,
set all of this world's events into motion,
and this is all going according to his "plan".
Now, as for you saying "Then pray to God/Jesus for ", ...
The correct way to finish that sentence is:
"...for nothing.".
For absolutely nothing.
Because:
1. They aren't literally real entities.
2. Prayer is a form of psychic-begging.
Begging a fictional entity is silly.
Whereas, begging a real entity would be insulting ... to any entity who is worthy of respect.
A morally mature and healthy person (self-aware, sentient being) ... would not want anyone groveling at their feet for 'scraps of love' or help with anything at all.
Thus, to BEG such a being ... is to ACCUSE them (automatically) of being a morally immature/unhealthy person.
Likewise,
to be a messenger for a "God"
is AUTOMATICALLY
to accuse that "God"
of being not-a-God.
How so?
Because any BEING whom is infinitely more capable than YOU ...
doesn't need your help getting a message out to anyone.
To rush out into the world to "Help" a "God" ...
is even more of an insult ABOUT that "God" ...
than rushing to help a fully able-bodied young man cross a busy street.
It makes sense to offer to help a frail old person,
if they seem to be struggling.
Why?
Because trying to HELP someone ...
means you doubt their ability,
feel bad for them,
and thus want to help them.
Meanwhile,
I'm still way ahead of you.
I already know what you plan to say,
to weasel out of this.
So let's 'nip that in bud' right here and now.
Saying "I'm not trying to help GOD, I'm trying to help people; people who are struggling and DO need help crossing the moral-street to reach GOD", ...
is a distraction technique.
It's also gaslighting.
Because you're not bringing the people TO a message.
You're bringing a message TO the people; FROM an alleged "God".
-a "God" who (according to your religion)
asked you to do this FOR HIM.
Per your religion,
"He" wants people to look for him, find him, and have a relationship with him.
And that includes people who are NOT looking for any such "God".
The theory that those people "stand to benefit" from the arrangement ... is not relevant to the point I'm making.
You are helping your frightened chicken of a "God" send a message across the road;
to reach us.
You are pimping yourself out as "His" vessel;
his "chariot".
- To bring his wisdom and "presence" to all humans;
people who would otherwise not ever hear a word about it.
But ONLY the message;
corrupted so badly that even his "biggest fans" can't agree on what it used to say;
-except for a few bits about "please love me" and something mumbled about "or else I might have to hurt you".
Not the actual chicken-God.
Because he's cowering behind bushes, and peering through clouds from high places ...
waiting and worrying about how we'll reply.
Passing notes forward;
like the painfully shy boy who sits in the back of the class.
[Back of the note reads:
"You know we should be together.
Don't make me have to hurt you."]
Except,
when people look back to see who the note is from,
he's not even there.
It was evidently (according to MOUNTAINS of evidence) written by someone else;
someone who is NOT shy ... but wants to collect money (and power, and flattery) on behalf of a sickly-chicken-boy-God who they invented.
Likewise,
if a Super-Being were to ACCEPT your help ...
that would automatically validate the accusation.
Which accusation?
The one you are making against him.
The accusation
that HE needs your help.
That would be the opposite of a good "Public Relations" campaign.
Because it means you are projecting WEAKNESS and reckless irresponsibility as attributes of your "God".
Lastly, I appreciate the intent of spreading STOIC ideals.
But I can't get behind the gambit of trying to pass Christianity off as being compatible with those ideals.
It's not.
Besides entirely relying upon maneuvering people into displacing (externalizing) the locus of their identity (which is the true root of clinical narcissism), ...
Christianity is BUILT upon the Genesis-Ideal.
Those fables,
were written by abusive men.
They sought to legitimize their sickness by projecting their Major Personality Disorders
onto a "God".
-So that it would be "wrong" for anyone to question their way of 'being' in the world.
In those stories,
a Super-Father sabotaged his children's psychological capacity;
even before he made them.
He,
with the help of his people
[his flying monkeys and triangulators]
then continued to do-so ever after;
hoping to assure they could never fully reach the autonomous capacity of adulthood.
And why?
So that he will always have someone who would say "He can do no wrong"
and would be lost without him.
____
To all of that, I say:
Comments
Post a Comment