Clinical Narcissist Poses As Fake Research Center To Re-Invent And Enable Narcissism As A Culture


The Global Center for Religious Research
epStroosnd 9a319c M5g1 t2cr36m4Peu gee9bl5c121t6064D0:1fa920 ·



The History of Religion: A field that helps you spot those ancient texts your pastor takes too literally! #ReligiousWisdom #GCRR




James Apperson

eh.
I mean, sure. For some passages, this is true.
But let's just admit that the fundamentalists are mostly correct.
The most psychopathic, irrational, and factually wrong texts were simply written by unhinged religious lunatics who knew almost nothing about history, science, etc..

  
AuthorThe Global Center for Religious Research

James Apperson Yikes, brother. Those are some wild assumptions about the mental state of ancient people ... whom you've never met and (apparently) don't know much about. Perhaps a History of Religion class should be on your Christmas wish list this year
 -------
James Apperson
 
Dude.
How are you going to get a friendly metaphor
out of commands to hurt babies, children, families, old people, etc?

  
James Apperson

I've spent a lot of time listening to Dr Jennifer Bird talk about the God-awful ways the "Biblical" Hebrews (and earliest Christians) saw women, and how they treated women.
Bible-writers saw women as lesser people…
See more

 

AuthorThe Global Center for Religious Research

James Apperson Who said anything about friendly metaphors? The problem is that you have zero education or training with this subject matter, and it shows with all those wild, knee-jerk assumptions about people you know nothing about and literature you don’t understand. Maybe try to learn from experts first before pretending to be one.




 

James Apperson

The Global Center for Religious Research
I understand.
Your ego feels attacked
and so, in response, you try to attack mine.
But it's not going to work.
Meanwhile, you aren't really arguing with me.
You're arguing against the experts in those fields.
I cited several.
All of them see it the way I do.
That's half the reason I see it how I do.
The other half (again) is:
I can read.
Bible-Story writers, editors, and translators
all decided to paint vivid pictures of extra-violent people
reasoning and behaving extra-violently; "in the name of God".
They also made it very clear that their favorite patriarchal deity was a literal, sentient, self-aware, emotional, super-powered person
who literally said and literally did a lot of really messed up things;
things which those people thought of as perfectly fine.
Some of it was metaphorical.
Some of it was just moral tales; meant to be assumed as "didn't literally happen. But the story teaches us something".
But a lot of it was clearly meant to be taken as literally real entities and happenings.
I didn't write those stories.
Don't blame me.
Or do.

Send us a message.

We’ll reply within a day
10:23 AM
Welcome to GCRR! Did you know our team of professional scholars and academics can conduct research for you, as well as edit and peer-review your papers? So, how can we help you today?
Thanks! Message us here.
Ah yes, we see your Facebook posts now. Did you really just call ancient religious people "psychopathic, irrational ... unhinged religious lunatics"? And you're worried about the admin's personality??? 🤣 If your feelings have been hurt, we recommend staying off our social media platform. We're a research institute, not a day spa that coddles every thought that pops into people's heads. Thanks for reaching out!
Translation: "I AM the vulnerable narcissist that went after you there.. But I'm hoping my prior failed attempt to make that sting .. will maybe work this time instead. Please give me some indication that it's working. My ego needs this."
LOL See!? That's why we recommend taking a hermeneutics course! We just don't think interpreting texts is your strong suit with all those weird and absurd assumptions.
I couldn't help but notice that the one post of mine that you deleted ... was the video clip of Dr Jennifer Bird agreeing with me about exactly the thing you are taking objection to.
Oh that's hilarious. We actually know Jen personally! We can promise that she doesn't agree with you labeling ancient storytellers as "psychopathic, irrational ... unhinged religious lunatics." In fact, why don't you email her directly and tell her all your theories about the psychological instability of those people? [jennifergracebird@gmail.com] Let her know GCRR sent you. In the meantime, you go on trying to argue with actual experts in this field if it helps you pass the time. Let us know when your doctoral thesis comes out about how you're right and everyone else is wrong about the ancient world. Just send us a link for when it gets published. We're always eager to learn from internet trolls.
Dude. Again. I posted the clip of her agreeing. And then you deleted it. That means you know what she thinks about it. That's her Youtube channel. That's a video clip of her agreeing with me about it. - Unless you think "men with major personality disorders writing "How To" guides for getting away with it" is code-speak for "Those people were sane, kind, wise, and reasonable"? Ego-posturing and Gaslighting. That's all your clinical narcissists know how to do.
Enjoy your fake, one-man-research center.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gods Exist; As A Way Of Thinking And Speaking That We Can Grow Past

Responding to "HOW DO YOU KNOW?" that (any) historical issue is a settled issue(?)

Christian-Fundamentalism's Relationship To Racism