The Inherent Hypocrisy And "Bad Witness" of Christians Who Fight To Ban Abortion


When Christians oppose abortion on moral grounds,
they are actually contradicting their own moral premise.

Consider: 

Bibles says to "put first the kingdom (of Heaven)".

If an aborted fetus = a "dead baby", then that "baby" gets a free ticket to paradise (unless your "God" is evil enough to send babies to a Hell).

- Whereas, if it lives to see "the age of accountability", then the odds of it ending up in "Hell" are very very high.

Therefore:
Morally speaking, Christians should be WANTING all fetuses be aborted; to ensure their "eternal fate" is a good one.

----
Meanwhile, ...
* If the reason the Christian "God" allows so much suffering and death ... is because:

HIS own moral view is:
"free will" must not be interfered with, ...
then:

Christians are actually fighting AGAINST their God's moral foundation ... by trying to interfere with other people's "free will";

- worse yet: when they interfere with other people's "free will" ... "in His name".
---
If your "God" considers it WRONG for HIM to interfere, ...

Then your GOD would not sanction anyone else to interfere;

because then he would be defying his own moral code;

-unless he has some sort of Multiple Personality Disorder
and keeps forgetting what his own moral views are.
---

Maybe your "God" really is that crazy.
Or ...
maybe that's just you.
---

Consider, then, what sort of "witness" you're being, to defy Him.

You're basically telling the world ... that you think your "God" is an idiot.
So you've *gone rogue* ... to take a stand of ACTION ... that he wasn't wise enough to agree with.

Consider, then, that anyone who NOTICES that ...
is RIGHTLY pushed away FROM your religion's deity;
because YOU just gave countless people ample reason to doubt the entire premise.

 After all, since YOU (and countless other "believers" in your religion)
don't respect your alleged "God's" morally-themed ideals, ...
Why should anyone?

Granted, everyone already HAD ample reason to doubt it.
But that doesn't excuse you ... choosing to give everyone even more reasons to stop taking your religion seriously.
---
Consider, then, what your bible says ... about BELIEVERS ... who "stumble" people.

It says that your God ... will make sure
you regret that day YOU were born.

That's pretty ironic, considering that it's the abortion debate that you're choosing to defy your religion's GOD about.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gods Exist; As A Way Of Thinking And Speaking That We Can Grow Past

Image
[Version 3.0 Please pardon the typos and other "wonk". This is a work in progress. Feedback would be greatly appreciated. But even if all you do is read it, I'll still be very grateful.  Thanks] ====== Some people worship actually-existing things; like the Sun.  Some Sun worshippers proceed without assuming the Sun is sentient.  They have that relationship to the Sun, as a brilliant, live-giving, and sometimes punishing power.  It's a humbling awe. It's also an idea that informs them of who they are. They are a recipient of life from a personified life-giver.  They are a subject to the threat that anyone who dares stare too long at the Sun may be struck blind. They are subject to limits and consequences, if they spend too much or too little time in the Sun's presence.  The Sun blesses us caretakers and sharers of the abundant life that the Sun imparts.  The Sun makes sure the lakes and sky share their life giving waters. It directly helps ~shape~ ever Sun-wors
Read more

Responding to "HOW DO YOU KNOW?" that (any) historical issue is a settled issue(?)

Image
This blog was inspired by a discussion happening in a forum on Facebook. Specifically, the issue on the table was: "Did the writers of Matthew, Mark, and Luke/Acts think that Jesus was either part of a Triune-Godhead, or at least the same "God" as the patriarchal deity of 2nd Temple Judaism?" Predictably, a Trinitarian religious fundamentalist said "yes". Predictably, an enabler of unspecified background has rushed in to support that fundamentalist. In context, it's really obvious to me that the enabler was raised in that same ideological culture; no matter how religious they may-or-may-not-be currently. So when I pointed out what actual scholars say about it, I also pointed out that this is a settled issue. In reply, he insisted: There are never any truly settled issues among qualified scholars. Both a real scholar and an honest (and minimally intelligent) laymen would realize this. [Note: this is just a variation of the stunt being
Read more

Christian-Fundamentalism's Relationship To Racism

Image
For now, I'll just start with a few key issues; in no particular order. 1. Atheism isn't a worldview or a values system. It's like being a non-astrologist, or a non-Leprechaun-ist. If someone doesn't believe in leprechauns in general, or if they more specifically don't believe in "The Eternal King of the Leprechauns", this really doesn't inform their personal views and values. 2. For context, I don't identify as an "atheist". The term "atheist" means "not a theist". The term "theist" means "believes in a god". The term "god" means: whatever the invoker wants it to mean. Therefore, the term "atheist" fails to make any meaningful distinction, because the term "god" fails to provide its own meaning. However, ... 3. Once a god-word-invoker does clarify their meaning, then (in that context) the term "atheist" can be contextually meaningfu
Read more